AI Model Comparison: DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-V3, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, OpenAI o1

AI Model Showdown: DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-V3, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and OpenAI o1 Compared (Jan 2025 Update)

The field of Artificial Intelligence continues its relentless pace, with new and updated Large Language Models (LLMs) constantly emerging and pushing the boundaries of performance. Keeping track of the leading contenders and their capabilities is crucial for developers, researchers, and businesses looking to leverage the best tools.

Based on our comparative analysis, current as of January 22, 2025, let's dive into a head-to-head look at four prominent models: DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-V3, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and OpenAI o1.

‍

Here's a breakdown of how these models stack up across key technical and performance metrics:

Foundational Characteristics (From Part 1):

• Model Type:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) - Specialized reasoning model
  • DeepSeek-V3: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) - Broad-spectrum language model
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Dense - General-purpose language model
  • OpenAI o1: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) - Specialized reasoning model (Proprietary, GPT-4o based)
• Model Size (Parameters):
  • DeepSeek-R1: 67+ billion parameters
  • DeepSeek-V3: 67+ billion parameters
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 70 billion parameters
  • OpenAI o1: Proprietary (likely very large, built on GPT-4o base)
• Context Window:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Up to 128k tokens
  • DeepSeek-V3: Up to 128k tokens
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Up to 128k tokens
  • OpenAI o1: Up to 200k tokens
• Maximum Output:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Up to 32k tokens
  • DeepSeek-V3: Up to 8,000 tokens (can adjust)
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Up to 2,048 tokens
  • OpenAI o1: Up to 100k tokens
• Release Date:
  • DeepSeek-R1: January 20, 2025
  • DeepSeek-V3: December 26, 2024
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: December 6, 2024
  • OpenAI o1: December 5, 2024
• Knowledge Cut-off:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Unknown
  • DeepSeek-V3: Unknown (Public speculation: July 1, 2024)
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: December 1, 2023
  • OpenAI o1: October 1, 2023

Performance & Practicalities (From Part 2):

• Open Source:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Yes
  • DeepSeek-V3: Yes
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Yes
  • OpenAI o1: No
• General Performance:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Comparable to top closed-source models.
  • DeepSeek-V3: Competitive with leading models.
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Strong open-source performer.
  • OpenAI o1: Top-tier closed-source model.
• Code Generation (HumanEval pass@1):
  • DeepSeek-R1: Excels at accurately generating and debugging complex code.
  • DeepSeek-V3: Strong performance (82.6%).
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Improved performance (88.4%).
  • OpenAI o1: Exceptional performance (92.4%).
• Efficiency:
  • DeepSeek-R1: Generally faster than o1 for coding tasks.
  • DeepSeek-V3: Efficient processing.
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Relatively efficient for its size.
  • OpenAI o1: Efficient, but can be slow for complex tasks (up to minutes).
• MMLU / MATH Scores:
  • DeepSeek-R1: 90.8% / 97.3% (MATH = 500)
  • DeepSeek-V3: 88.5% / 61.6% (4-shot)
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 86% / 77% (0-shot, CoT)
  • OpenAI o1: 92.3% / 94.8% pass@1
• Input / Output Costs (Per 1M Tokens):
  • DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 / $2.19
  • DeepSeek-V3: $0.14 / $0.28
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: $0.23 / $0.40
  • OpenAI o1: $15.00 / $60.00

‍

Key Takeaways

1. Open Source Power: DeepSeek and Llama offer strong open-source alternatives, providing transparency and customization options often preferred by researchers and developers wary of vendor lock-in. Llama 3.3 70B stands out as a particularly strong open-source performer, while the DeepSeek models offer impressive capabilities, especially R1 in coding.
2. Coding Prowess: OpenAI o1 demonstrates exceptional coding performance on HumanEval, closely followed by DeepSeek-R1, highlighting the focus on specialized reasoning and code generation in these newer models.
3. Cost-Effectiveness: There's a stark contrast in API costs. The open-source models (particularly DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3) offer significantly lower costs per million tokens compared to OpenAI o1, making them highly attractive for large-scale or budget-conscious applications.
4. Context Kings: While most models offer a respectable 128k context window, OpenAI o1 leads with up to 200k tokens, potentially beneficial for tasks requiring analysis of very long documents or complex histories. However, o1 also has a lower maximum output limit compared to DeepSeek-R1.
5. MoE vs. Dense: Three out of the four models (DeepSeek-R1, V3, and OpenAI o1) utilize the Mixture-of-Experts architecture, suggesting a trend towards this more computationally efficient approach for scaling large models, while Llama 3.3 70B demonstrates the continued power of dense architectures.
6. Performance vs. Efficiency: While OpenAI o1 often leads in benchmarks (like HumanEval and MMLU), it comes with the highest cost and potential latency for complex tasks. DeepSeek-R1 offers competitive coding performance potentially faster, and the other open-source models provide strong performance at much lower price points.

Conclusion: Choose Your Champion Wisely

As of early 2025, the AI landscape offers compelling choices. OpenAI o1 remains a top-tier closed-source performer, particularly strong in coding, but comes at a premium cost and with potential latency. The DeepSeek models (R1 and V3) and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct present powerful, cost-effective open-source alternatives, each with specific strengths – DeepSeek-R1 excelling in coding speed/accuracy for its cost, DeepSeek-V3 offering remarkable affordability, and Llama 3.3 providing solid all-around open-source performance.

The "best" model ultimately depends on your specific needs: Is bleeding-edge performance paramount, regardless of cost? Is open-source access critical? Are you optimizing for coding tasks or general language understanding? Is API cost a major factor? Carefully evaluating these factors against the capabilities outlined here will help you select the right AI powerhouse for your projects.