From defining requirements to disclosing relationships — the work that turns vendor noise into a decision you can defend.
01
Requirements definition
Translate the business outcome into the technical, operational, and commercial criteria a provider has to meet — so every candidate is measured against the same bar.
02
Vendor shortlist support
Build or pressure-test a shortlist of qualified providers scoped to the initiative — not an open-ended search for every kind of talent.
03
Technical claim assessment
Probe what providers say they can do: architecture, integration fit, data handling, security posture, and the gap between the demo and production.
04
Proposal comparison
Put competing proposals on a common footing — scope, assumptions, total cost, timeline, and risk — so leadership can compare like for like.
05
Risk flags
Surface the concerns that tend to stay buried: lock-in, hidden dependencies, capacity, support model, and claims that do not hold up under scrutiny.
06
Optional introductions
Where helpful, introduce you directly to qualified providers in the DataExos network — only when there is a genuine fit.
07
Optional oversight
If you want continuity, DataExos can stay involved through selection and into delivery as an independent technical check on the chosen provider.
08
Disclosure of referral relationships
Where a referral or partner relationship applies, we disclose it up front so your decision is fully informed.